Trends in Ecology & Evolution
ReviewThe Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography at Age Ten
Section snippets
The mystery of biodiversity
Imagine yourself deep in a tropical rain forest or floating over a coral reef surrounded by thousands of interacting species. How can so many species coexist? The traditional answer is that all species differ in important ways [1], so that each species is limited by a unique set of factors. Adaptive trade-offs prevent the evolution of super-species that are better at doing everything. Classic ecological niche theory captures the unique roles of species and, consequently, is often complex and
The history of neutral theory
Neutral theory makes a controversial ‘neutrality assumption’: all individuals within a particular trophic level have the same chances of reproduction and death regardless of their species identity [2]. Kimura pioneered the idea in a different context with his neutral theory of molecular evolution [3]. His intent was to model changes in allele frequency at a locus where all the alleles were selectively ‘neutral’, so that substituting one allele for another did not affect the fitness of an
Interpreting fits to empirical data
Most empirical evaluations of neutral models have focused on fitting the classic neutral model to species abundance distributions [2] (Box 1). Substantial improvements in the fitting methods have been developed since the early work (Box 2); in fact, one great benefit to the classic neutral model is that its simplicity allows a likelihood-based framework for fitting data 11, 12, 13, 14. Here, we do not attempt to enumerate the many fits that have been carried out [15], but instead focus on what
The other assumptions of the model
Classic neutral theory includes several ‘auxiliary assumptions’, unrelated to neutrality [30], which can cause the model to fail for reasons other than its neutrality and draw attention away from the key issues. It is therefore desirable to remove these auxiliary assumptions.
The future of neutral theory
The field has progressed considerably during the past 10 years, but what developments do the next 10 years hold in store? In this section, we discuss the possibilities.
Discussion
History has shown, not only in physics, but also in ecology, that one can make considerable progress with simple models. The ideal gas law, for example, is a good approximation, but there are no ‘ideal gases’ in reality. The success of the birth–death model of diversification [76], MacArthur and Wilson's theory of island biogeography [10] and Levins’ metapopulation model [83] are all testimony to the utility of simple models in ecology and evolution. Neutral theory follows this tradition.
Acknowledgements
We thank the editor Paul Craze and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank Bart Haegeman, David Alonso, Egbert Leigh, Jr., Evan Economo, Fangliang He, Jonathan Eastman, Luke Harmon, Matt Pennell, Stephen Cornell and members of the Harmon and Rosenblum lab groups for their useful comments and discussions on the paper. JR was funded by the EPSRC (grant EP/F043112/1); RSE acknowledges financial support from NWO.
Glossary
- Beta-diversity
- also known as distance-decay; the probability as a function of distance between two individuals that they will be of the same species.
- Coalescence
- a technique developed in population genetics for simulating or analytically solving properties of a sample of individuals by tracing their ancestry back to their common ancestors.
- Dispersal kernel
- a statistical distribution describing stochastic dispersal events by giving the probability of dispersal as a function of distance.
- Dispersal
References (100)
The merits of neutral theory
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2006)The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory
J. Theor. Biol.
(2007)A spatially explicit model for tropical tree diversity patterns
J. Theor. Biol.
(2010)- et al.
Speciation-rate dependence in species–area relationships
J. Theor. Biol.
(2009) - et al.
Relaxing the zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory
J. Theor. Biol.
(2008) Beyond neutral science
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2009)Maximum likelihood estimation of neutral model parameters for multiple samples with different degrees of dispersal limitation
J. Theor. Biol.
(2009)- et al.
Spatial models for species–area curves
J. Theor. Biol.
(1996) A coalescence approach to spatial neutral ecology
Ecol. Inform.
(2008)Dynamics of neutral biodiversity
Math. Biosci.
(2008)
Predictions of Taylor's power law, density dependence and pink noise from a neutrally modeled time series
J. Theor. Biol.
Sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles
Theor. Popul. Biol.
The Struggle For Existence
The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography
The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population
Genetics
Community structure – neutral model analysis
Ecol. Monogr.
Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest
Science
The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment
J. Theor. Biol.
A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs
Coral Reefs
The distribution of abundance in neutral communities
Am. Nat.
Ecology – neutral macroecology
Science
An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography
Evolution
A novel genealogical approach to neutral biodiversity theory
Ecol. Lett.
A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles
Ecol. Lett.
A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity
Ecol. Lett.
Empirical evaluation of neutral theory
Ecology
Deriving a neutral model of species abundance from fundamental mechanisms of population dynamics
Funct. Ecol.
Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity
Ecol. Lett.
Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
Dynamical evolution of ecosystems
Nature
Neutral theory and the theory of island biogeography
Neutral assembly of bacterial communities
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.
Inferring the parameters of the neutral theory of biodiversity using phylogenetic information and implications for tropical forests
Ecol. Lett.
Species–area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape
Ecol. Lett.
Species–area curves, neutral models and long distance dispersal
Ecology
Long-distance dispersal of plants
Science
Neutral theory: a historical perspective
J. Evol. Biol.
Hubbell's local abundance distribution: insights from a simple colonization rule
Oikos
Speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity
Bioessays
The neutral theory of biodiversity with random fission speciation
Theor. Ecol.
On the relative abundance of bird species
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity
Oikos
Self-consistent approach for neutral community models with speciation
Phys. Rev. E
Why do some tropical forests have so many species of trees?
Biotropica
A comment on Hubbell's zero-sum ecological drift model
Oikos
Modes of speciation and the lifespans of species under neutrality: a response to the comment of Robert E
Ricklefs. Oikos
Setting the absolute tempo of biodiversity dynamics
Ecol. Lett.
The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up?
Ecology
Cited by (503)
The combination of multiple environmental stressors strongly alters microbial community assembly in aquatic ecosystems
2024, Journal of Environmental ManagementComposition and assembly mechanisms of prokaryotic communities in wetlands, and their relationships with different vegetation and reclamation methods
2023, Science of the Total Environment